Técnicas primárias de remediação em áreas de aquíferos contaminados – Uma Revisão
Resumen
Esta revisão acadêmica apresenta informações recentes e relevantes sobre abordagens de remediação especificamente para aquíferos contaminados, enfatizando sua escolha com base no tipo de contaminante e nas condições hidrogeológicas e ambientais específicas do local de estudo. A poluição de águas subterrâneas em ambientes urbanos resulta principalmente do manejo inadequado de resíduos e de atividades industriais ou domésticas, levando a contaminantes persistentes, como metais pesados e hidrocarbonetos. São apresentados alguns passos de investigação, desde a Modelagem Conceitual do Local até a implementação da remediação, com base em referências brasileiras e internacionais. O estudo classifica os contaminantes, discute fatores de avaliação de risco e compara métodos físicos, químicos e biológicos. Por fim, apresenta dados de custo, eficiência e tempo de implementação para apoiar a tomada de decisão em projetos de remediação de aquíferos.
Citas
ABBASI, M. et al. Enhanced adsorption of heavy metals in groundwater using sand columns enriched with graphene oxide: lab-scale experiments and process modelling. Journal of Water Process Engineering, [s. l.], v. 40, 101961. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101961
AGUIAR, R.; GABRIEL, M. Remediação de áreas contaminadas por cromo hexavalente: relato sobre gerenciamento de projeto. Revista Inovação Projetos e Tecnologias, São Paulo, v. 2, n. 1, p. 67-84, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/iptec.v2i1.15
ALAZAIZA, M. et al. Thermal based remediation technologies for soil and groundwater: a review. Desalination and Water Treatment, [s. l.], v. 259, p. 206-220, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.28433
AL-HASHIMI, O. et al. A Comprehensive Review for Groundwater Contamination and Remediation: Occurrence, Migration and Adsorption Modelling. Molecules, [s. l.], v. 26, 5913, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195913
BAALI, F. et al. Underground water quality and contamination risk: The case of the basin of Cheria (NE Algeria). Estudios Geológicos, v. 63, n. 2, p. 127–133, jul./dic. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/egeol.07632193
BALDAN, E. et al. Development, assessment and evaluation of a biopile for hydrocarbons soil remediation. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, [s. l.], v. 98, p. 66-72, Mar. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.12.002
BAQER, Y.; CHEN, X. A review on reactive transport model and porosity evolution in the porous media. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, [s. l.], v. 29, p. 47873–47901, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20466-w
BAYER, P. et al. Cost‐optimal contaminant plume management with a combination of pump‐and‐treat and physical barrier systems. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 96–106, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2005.0022.x
BENAMAR, A. et al. Suffusion evaluation of coarse-graded soils from Rhine dikes. Acta Geotechnica, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 3, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00782-1
BEN-NOAH, I. Air sparging analysis through the continuum approach. Vienna: EGU General Assembly, EGU25-1787, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1787
BERGLUND, S.; CVETKOVIC, V. Pump-and-treat remediation of heterogeneous aquifers: Effects of rate-limited mass transfer. Groundwater, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 4, p. 675–685, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00324.x
BERTAGI, L. T. et al. Aplicações ambientais de persulfato: remediação de águas subterrâneas e solos contaminados. Artigo de revisão. Química Nova, Campinas, v. 44, n. 9, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20170769
BERTOLINI, M. et al. Sequential Anaerobic/Aerobic Microbial Transformation of Chlorinated Ethenes: Use of Sustainable Approaches for Aquifer Decontamination. Water, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 7, 1406. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15071406
BIRNSTINGL, J.; WILSON, J. A Cost Comparison of Pump‐and‐Treat and In Situ Colloidal Activated Carbon for PFAS Plume Management. Remediation Journal, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 1, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.70005
BOLOBAJEV, J. et al. Effect of iron ion on doxycycline photocatalytic and Fenton-based autocatalytic decomposition. Chemosphere, [s. l.], v. 153, p. 220 – 226. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.042
BOOTH, J. et al. Experimental comparison of agent-enhanced flushing for the recovery of crude oil from saturated porous media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, [s. l.], v. 226, 103504, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103504
BORTONE, I. et al. Pump-and-treat configurations with vertical and horizontal wells to remediate an aquifer contaminated by hexavalent chromium. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, [s. l.], v. 235, 103725, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103725
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Programa nacional de recuperação de áreas contaminadas. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2020. E-book.
BURRI, N. et al. A review of threats to groundwater quality in the Anthropocene. Science of The Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 684, p. 136 -154, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.236
CANO-LÓPEZ, A. et al. Novel Oxidation Strategies for the In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvents from Groundwater -
A Bench-Scale Study. Water, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 9, 1241, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091241
CARROLL, K. et al. Rethinking pump-and-treat remediation as maximizing contaminated groundwater. Environmental Science, Instruction Hydrology and Atmospheric Science, [s. l.], v. 918, 170600, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170600
CETESB. Decisão de Diretoria nº 038/2017/C, de 07 de fevereiro de 2017. Dispõe sobre procedimentos para o gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas no Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo: CETESB. 2017.
CETESB. Decisão de Diretoria nº 056/2024. Atualiza procedimentos e critérios técnicos relacionados às etapas de investigação e remediação de áreas contaminadas. São Paulo: CETESB. 2024.
CETESB. Decisão de Diretoria nº 106/2022/P. Estabelece procedimentos técnicos e administrativos aplicáveis ao gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas. São Paulo: CETESB. 2022.
CETESB. Manual de gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas.3. ed. rev. São Paulo: CETESB, 2025.
CETESB. Poluição das águas subterrâneas. São Paulo,2021.
CIAMPI, P. et al. 3D GeoRemediation: A Digital Hydrogeophysical–Chemical Clone and Virtual Hydraulic Barrier with Groundwater Circulation Wells (GCWs) for Groundwater Remediation. Sustainability, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 12, 5216, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125216
CL:AIRE. Guidance and technical reports on contaminated land management. London: CL:Aire, 2025.
CL:AIRE. The Definition of Waste: Development Industry Code of Practice. London: CL:Aire, 2011.
CONAMA. Resolução nº 420, de 28 de dezembro de 2009. Dispõe sobre critérios e valores orientadores de qualidade do solo quanto à presença de substâncias químicas e estabelece diretrizes para o gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas. Brasília: Conama, 2009.
EBELING, P. et al. Potential of mixed hydraulic barriers to remediate seawater intrusion. The Science of Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 693, 133478, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.284
EL MEKNASSI, S. et al. Seawater 87Sr/86Sr ratios along continental margins: Patterns and processes in open and restricted shelf domains. Chemical Geology, [s. l.], v. 558, 119874. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119874
EL-AASSAR, A. et al. Integration of groundwater vulnerability with contaminants transport modeling in unsaturated zone, case study El-Sharqia, Egypt. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, [s. l.], v. 195, article number 722, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11298-3
EPA. CERCLA/Superfund – Groundwater Remedy. Selecting a groundwater remedy under Superfund. Washington, DC, 2025.
EPA. Cost and performance report for LNAPL characterization and remediation. Multi-Phase Extraction and Dual-Pump Recovery of LNAPL at the BP Former Amoco Refinery, Sugar Creek, MO. EPA 542-R-05-016. 2005.
EPA. Groundwater Pump and Treat Systems: Summary of Selected Cost and Performance Information at Superfund-financed Sites. Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 542-R-01-021b. 2001.
EPA. Guidance for conducting remedial investigations and feasibility studies under CERCLA. Washington, DC, 1988.
EPA. How to evaluate alternative cleanup technologies for underground storage tank sites. A guide for corrective action plan reviewers. Chapter: IV Biopiles (EPA 510-B-17-003). 2017.
EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS). Washington, DC, 1989.
EUGRIS. European Information System Soil and Groundwater. General consult to the homepage. 2008. Available in: [http://www.eugris.info](http://www.eugris.info). Access in: Aug. 2024.
FALCONI, M. et al. In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) report: Impel, common forum: Eionet, Nicole report no 2020/09, ISCO. Brussels: IMPEL, 2021.
FOSTER, S. et al. Groundwater quality protection: a guide for water service companies, municipal authorities and environments agencies. 1. ed. Washington: World Bank Group, 2002. v. 1, 103 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4951-1
FOSTER, S.; HIRATA, R. Determinación del riesgo de contaminación de aguas subterráneas: una metodología basada en datos existentes. 2nd ed. Lima: Centro Panamericano de Ingenieria Sanitaria y Ciencias dei Ambiente (CEPIS), 1991.
FREEZE, A.; CHERRY, J. Groundwater. 604 p., Englewood Cliffs. 1979.
FRITZ, B. et al. Guidance for Monitoring Passive Groundwater Remedies over Extended Time Scales. Report, Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1728467
FRTR. Biopiles. 2025a.
FRTR. In Situ Chemical Reduction. 2025c.
FRTR. In Situ Thermal Treatment. 2025b.
FURTADO, M. Remediação de solos: Para afastar o perigo que se esconde nos subterrâneos das grandes cidades, meios legais e econômicos devem fomentar obras de descontaminação. Revista Química e Derivados, São Paulo, 2008. Available in: [http://www.quimica.com.br/revista/qd437/solos5.htm](http://www.quimica.com.br/revista/qd437/solos5.htm). Access in: Aug. 2024.
GAILEY, R. Inactive supply wells as conduits for flow and contaminant migration: conditions of occurrence and suggestions for management. Hydrogeology Journal, [s. l.], v. 25, p. 2163 – 2183, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1588-y
GAVASKAR, A. et al. Design Guidance for Application of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Groundwater Remediation. Columbus: SERDP – Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, 2000. 167 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA379980
GOMAA, S. et al. Assessment of seawater intrusion under different pumping scenarios in Moghra aquifer, Egypt. Science of the Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 781, 146710, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146710
GOMES, C.; COUTINHO, R. Técnicas para remediação de aqüíferos contaminados por vazamentos de derivados de petróleo em postos de combustíveis. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE RECURSOS HÍDRICOS, 17, 2007, São Paulo. Anais […]. Porto Alegre: ABRHidro. 2007.
HAMIDI, D. et al. Spatial estimation of groundwater quality, hydrogeochemical investigation, and health impacts of shallow groundwater in Kabul city, Afghanistan. Sustainable Water Resources Management, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 20, p. 1–14, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00808-9
HELENE, L. P. I.; MOREIRA, C. A. Proposta de remediação de aquífero contaminado por chorume de aterro sanitário e monitoramento por método geofísico. Holos, Rio Claoro, 2016. Trabalho apresentado no 9. Encontro de Geociências e Meio Ambiente, 2016.
HERRERO, J. et al. Combined use of ISCR and biostimulation techniques in incomplete processes of reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated solvents. The Science of the Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 648, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.184
HIDALGO, G. et al. Global Perspectives on Groundwater Decontamination: Advances and Challenges of the Role of Permeable Reactive Barriers. Hydrology, [s. l.], v. 12, 98, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12040098
HIESTER, U.; SCHRENK, V. Thermally enhanced in-situ remediations beneath buildings during their continued usage – new source removal options for urban sites. Conference ConSoil, at Milano, v. 10. 2008.
HIRATA, R. et al. Águas Subterrâneas Urbanas no Brasil: avaliação para uma gestão sustentável. 1. ed. São Paulo: Instituto de Geociências e FAPESP, v. 1. 112 p. 2015.
HIRATA, R. et al. As águas subterrâneas e sua importância ambiental e socioeconômica para o Brasil. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; Instituto de Geociências, 66 p. 2019.
HUANG, K. et al. Advances in remediation of contaminated sites. Processes, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 1, 157. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010157
HURST, J. et al. PFAS Soil Treatment Processes – A Review of Operating Ranges and Constraints. Environmental Science for European Fuel Manufacturing, [s. l.], v. 8/24, p. 157. 2024.
IDELOVITCH, E.; MICHAIL, M. Soil-aquifer treatment - a new approach to an old method of wastewater reuse. Jour Water Poll Control Fed., [s. l.], v. 56, p. 936-943, 1984.
IRTC. Integrated Site Characterization and Monitoring. Washington, DC. 2020. . Não consta citação
ISLAM, A.; QUARESHI, A. R. Groundwater Contamination and Remediation: A Review. African Journal of Biomedical Research, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 3S, p. 3855–3867, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i3S.3062
ISLAM, F. Groundwater Pollution and Contamination: Sources, Impacts, Management, and the Integration of AI/ML for Future Solutions. Research Journal in Civil, Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, [s. l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 3079 – 2630. 2025. . Não consta citação DOI: https://doi.org/10.61424/rjcime.v2i2.307
KHAN, M. et al. Megacity pumping and preferential flow threaten groundwater quality. Nature Communications, [s. l.], v. 7, Article number: 12833. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12833
KIRMIZAKIS, P. et al. Microbial fuel cells to monitor natural attenuation around groundwater plumes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, [s. l.], v. 32, p. 2069–2084. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35848-5
KRINGEL, R.; WEGNER, Martin; JELEN, Paul. "Monitored Natural Attenuation" von LCKW am Beispiel des KORA TP3 Standortes Hannover-Südstadt 2006 bis 2019. In: CONFERENCE SYMPOSIUM STRATEGIEN ZUR BODEN- UND GRUNDWASSERSANIERUNG, 25, 2023, Dechema. Frankfurt am Main. 2023.
KRUCON, T. et al. Application of xylene-degrading bacteria in the treatment of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons – A comprehensive laboratory to pilot-scale analysis. Science of the Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 957, 177501. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177501
LAPWORTH, D. et al. Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: A review of sources, fate and occurrence. Environ. Pollut., [s. l.], v. 163, p. 287–303. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.034
LASAGAS, R. et al. Reductive degradation of carbon tetrachloride using tree leaf polyphenol–iron complexes for groundwater remediation. RSC Advances, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 28, p. 22915-22929, Jul. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA01391G
LI, H. et al. Influence of Trapping Forces on the Morphological Redistribution of DNAPL During Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer Remediation. International Journal of Environmental Research, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 6, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-025-00896-3
LI, X. et al. Comprehensive review of emerging contaminants: Detection technologies, environmental impact, and management strategies. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, [s. l.], v. 278, 116420, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116420
LI, X. et al. Rice straw particles covered with Brevundimonas naejangsanensis DD1 cells can synergistically remove doxycycline from water using adsorption and biotransformation. Chemosphere, v. 291, Part 2, 132828, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132828
LIANG, X. et al. Effect of the aquifer media on groundwater pollution remediation by air sparging. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), [s. l.], v. 42, p. 392-396. 2012.
LIAO, F. et al. Stabilization mechanism and remediation effectiveness of Pb and cd in agricultural soil using nonmetallic minerals. Scientific Reports, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 12757. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96970-z
LIU, C. et al. Endophyte Pseudomonas putida enhanced Trifolium repens L. growth, and heavy metal uptake: A promising in-situ non-soil cover phytoremediation method of nonferrous metallic tailing. Chemosphere, [s. l.], v. 272, 129816, Jun. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129816
LIU, H. et al. In situ chemical oxidation of contaminated groundwater by persulfate: decomposition by Fe (III) - and Mn (IV) - containing oxides and aquifer materials. Environmental Science Technology, [s. l.], v. 48, n. 17, p. 10330-10336, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es502056d
LIU, X. et al. Frontiers in environmental cleanup: Recent advances in remediation of emerging pollutants from soil and water. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, [s. l.], v. 16, 100461, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100461
LUO, J. et al. Thermal performance enhancement of borehole heat exchangers by thermally induced groundwater convection in aquifers. Renewable Energy, [s. l.], v. 243 (C). 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122539
MADEIRA, J. Remediação de aquíferos contaminados por nitratos: um caso de estudo por biorremediação. 2010. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbora, 2010. 62 p.
MADISON, A. et al. Increasing in situ bioremediation effectiveness through field-scale application of molecular biological tools. Frontiers in microbiology, Lausanne, v. 10, 13: 1005871. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1005871
MAJONE, M. et al. In situ groundwater and sediment bioremediation: Barriers and perspectives at European contaminated sites. New Biotechnology, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 1, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.02.011
MARKALE, I. et al. Mixing Controlled Adsorption at the Liquid-Solid Interfaces in Unsaturated Porous Media. Transport in Porous Media, [s. l.], v. 146, p. 159–175, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01747-x
MCGACHY, L. et al. Peroxydisulfate Persistence in ISCO for Groundwater Remediation: Temperature Dependence, Batch/Column Comparison, and Sulfate Fate. Water, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 24, p. 3552. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243552
MEGDAL, S. Água invisível: a importância de uma boa governança e gestão das águas subterrâneas. NPJ Clean Water, [s. l.], n. 1, 15. 2018. Não consta citação
MENG, Y. et al. Mechanism study of the air migration and flowrate distribution in an aquifer with lenses of different permeabilities during air sparging remediation. The Science of the Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 722, 137844. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137844
MINEO, S. et al. Evolution of LNAPL contamination plume in fractured aquifers. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, [s. l.], v. 81, article number 134. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02627-w
MIRLEAN, N. et al. O impacto industrial na composição química das águas subterrâneas com enfoque de consumo humano. Química Nova, Campinas, v. 28, n. 5, p. 788-791, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422005000500010
MISHRA, S. et al. Robust Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon contaminated soil by microorganisms: A Review. Journal of Chemical Health Risks, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 1. 2024.
MOHAMMADIKIA, R. et al. The impact of soil moisture on the bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by bacterial strains. Journal of Soil Biology, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 1. 2025.
MUKHERJEE, A. et al. Arsenic and other geogenic contaminants in global groundwater. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 4, p. 312–328. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00519-z
NAVFAC. Permeable reactive barrier cost and performance report. Final Technical Report, TR-NAVFAC-ESC-EV-12072012. 85 p.
NEWELL, C. et al. In situ gas sparging for concentration and removal of per‐and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from groundwater. Remediation Journal, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 4, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21696
OLIVEIRA, A. et al. Biossegurança no gerenciamento de resíduos em consultório de estética. Revista Remecs, São Paulo, v. 10, n. 16, p. 166 – 175, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24281/rremecs2025.10.16.166
ORELLANA, R. et al. Economic Evaluation of Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Urban Soils in Chile. Sustainability, [s. l.], 14, 11854. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911854
ORTÚZAR, M. et al. Pharmaceutical Pollution in Aquatic Environments: A Concise Review of Environmental Impacts and Bioremediation Systems. Frontiers in Microbiology, [s. l.], v. 13, 869332, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.869332
OSTOVAR, M. et al. Advancements in biopile-based sustainable soil remediation: a decade of improvements, integrating bioremediation technologies and AI-based innovative tools. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 40, p. 22766–22793, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-37002-1
PANIGRAHI, T.; SANTHOSKUMAR, A. Adsorption process for reducing heavy metals in textile industrial effluent with low-cost adsorbents. Progress in Chemical and Biochemical Research, Ilam, v. 3, n. 2, p. 135-139, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33945/SAMI/PCBR.2020.2.7
QIAN, L. et al. Field demonstration of enhanced removal of chlorinated solvents in groundwater using biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. Science of The Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 698, 134215, Jan. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134215
QIN, J. et al. Recycling of heavy metals and modification of biochar derived from Napier grass using HNO3. Journal of Environmental Management, [s. l.], v. 318, 115556. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115556
RANA, G. et al. Photocatalytic Degradation of VOCs: Emerging Trends in Visible Light Catalyst Modifications and Surface Engineering. Journal of Cluster Science, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 3, p. 1-27. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-025-02799-x
ROBINSON, S. et al. Optimizing PFAS plume remediation: gas sparging and partially penetrating pump‐and‐treat systems. Remediation Journal, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 4, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.70031
ROSANSKY, S.; DINDAL, A. Cost and performance report for persulfate treatability studies. Columbus: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 2010. 103 p.
RUIDAS, D. et al. Hydrogeochemical evaluation of groundwater aquifers and associated health hazard risk mapping using ensemble data driven model in a water scares plateau region of eastern India. Exposure and Health, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 113-131. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-022-00480-6
SANTOS, A. et al. Gestão de resíduos de edificações corporativas. Revista FT, Rio de Janeiro, v. 29, n. 152, p. 23 – 24. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ra10202511302323
SANTOS, C.; RIBEIRO, H. Potential Transformation of Contaminated Areas into Public Parks: Evidence from São Paulo, Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 19 11933, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911933
SANTOS, E. et al. Principais técnicas de remediação e gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas por hidrocarbonetos no Estado de São Paulo. 2008. Monografia (Especialização em Gestão Ambiental) - Faculdade de Engenharia Mecânica da Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Campinas, 2008.
SAQR, A. et al. Integrating MODFLOW-USG and Walrus Optimizer for Estimating Sustainable Groundwater Pumping in Arid Regions Subjected to Severe Drawdown. In: ALI, S.; NEGM, A. Groundwater in Developing Countries. London: Springer Water Springer, 2025. p. 127-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79122-2_5
SELAK, L. et al. Microbial marker for seawater intrusion in a coastal Mediterranean shallow Lake, Lake Vrana, Croatia. Science of the Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 849, 157859, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157859
SHAO, G. et al. In situ bioelectrochemical remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater: A review. Environmental Pollution, [s. l.], v. 374, n. 14, p. 126250. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126250
SHIN, J. et al. Development of Site-Scale Conceptual Model Using Integrated Borehole Methods: Systematic Approach for Hydraulic and Geometric Evaluation. Water, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 9, 1336. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091336
SIDIROPOULOS, P. Groundwater Pollution: Sources, Mechanisms, and Prevention. Hydrology, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 7, 98. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11070098
SILLOS, M. et al. Modelo conceitual multissítios como ferramenta estratégica para gestão de brownfields: o caso do Arco Jurubatuba (Brasil). Derbyana, São Paulo, v. 46, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69469/derb.v46.885
SILVA, K. et al. Cork-based permeable reactive barriers coupled to electrokinetic processes for interrupting pollutants reaching groundwater: a case study of lead-contaminated soil. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, [s. l.], v. 97, n. 10, p. 2861-2870, Oct. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7158
SINGH, R.; CHAKMA, S.; BIRKE, V. Simulation study for the application of permeable reactive barrier for aquifer remediation in the proximity of Indian landfill site. Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vienna, v. 21, 2019.
SLIMENE, E. et al. The role of heterogeneous lithology in a glaciofluvial deposit on unsaturated preferential flow-a numerical study. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, [s. l.], v. 65, p. 209-21, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0004
SNIS. Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento. Série Histórica 2020.
SONG, Z. et al. Design of Pump-and-Treat Strategies for Contaminated Groundwater Remediation Using Numerical Modeling: A Case Study. Water, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 24, 3665, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243665
SPINA-CRUZ, M.; MANIERO, M. G; GUIMARÃES, J. R. Advanced oxidation processes on doxycycline degradation: monitoring of antimicrobial activity and toxicity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, Berlin, v. 26, n. 27, p. 27604 –27619, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2149-1
SUHOGUSOFF, A. et al. Water quality and risk assessment of dug wells: a case study for a poor community in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Environmental Earth Sciences, [s. l.], v.68, p.899-910. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1971-x
SUN, H. et al. Remediation of diesel-contaminated aquifers using thermal conductive heating coupled with thermally activated persulfate. Water Air and Soil Pollution, [s. l.], v. 232, n. 7, p. 293, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05240-x
SUN, J. et al. Chromium Distribution, Leachability and Speciation in a Chrome Plating Site. Processes, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 1, 142, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10010142
SWARNKUMAR, R.; OSBORNE, W. Heavy metal determination and aquatic toxicity evaluation of textile dyes and effluents using Artemia salina. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, [s. l.], v. 25, 101574, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101574
TRATNYEK, P. et al. In Situ Chemical Reduction for Source Remediation. In: KUEPER, Bernard H. et al. (ed.) Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone Remediation. [s. l.]: SERDP/ESTCP, 2014. cap. 10. p. 307-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6922-3_10
TRUEX, M. et al. Performance Assessment of Pump-and-Treat Systems. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, [s. l.], v. 37, n. 3, p. 28–44, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12218
UE. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, Brussels, 2000.
UE. Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration. Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, 2006.
UNITED KINGDOM. Environment Agency. Land Contamination: Risk Management (LCRM). Rotherham, 2020.
VERA, Y. M. et al. Remediação de aquíferos contaminados com metais utilizando a técnica de barreiras permeáveis reativas. In: ENTMME, 22.; MSHMT, 7., 2007, Ouro Preto. Anais […]. [Ouro Preto: s. n.], 2007. p. 565-571.
WANG, W. et al. In-situ remediation of contaminated groundwater by bioelectrochemical system: A review. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, [s. l.], v. 196, n. 1, p. 105914, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2024.105914
WEI, K. et al. Recent progress on in-situ chemical oxidation for the remediation of petroleum contaminated soil and groundwater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, [s. l.], v. 432, 128738, Jun. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128738
WEI, Y. et al. Quantitative assessment of monitoring natural attenuation on carbon tetrachloride reduction at a groundwater-contaminated site in Eastern China. Water Air and Soil Pollution, [s. l.], v. 234, n. 10, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06598-w
WEI, Z.; CHI, Z. Groundwater Risk Assessment based on drastic and special vulnerability of solidified/stabilized heavy-metal-contaminated sites. Sustainability, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 4, p. 2997, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042997
WIDDOWSON, M. et al. Estimating cleanup times associated with combining source-area remediation with monitored natural attenuation. Washington: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 2008. p. 192.
WILEY, T.; LEESON, A. Multi-Site In Situ Air Sparging, Multiple Locations. Washington: Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, 2025.
WU, L. et al. Simultaneous desorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals from contaminated soils by rhamnolipid biosurfactants. Journal of Ocean University of China, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 4, p. 874–882. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-020-4266-y
XIE, M. et al. Review on Research and Application of Enhanced In-Situ Bioremediation Agents for Organic Pollution Remediation in Groundwater. Water, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 456, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030456
XIE, T. et al. Decontamination of dense nonaqueous-phase liquids in groundwater using pump-and-treat and in situ chemical oxidation processes: a field test. RSC Advances, v. 11, p. 4237 – 4246, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA10010B
YANG, N. et al. Solvent-Free Nonthermal Destruction of PFAS Chemicals and PFAS in Sediment by Piezoelectric Ball Milling. Environmental Science Technology Letters, [s. l.], 10, p. 198-203, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00902
YANG, Y. et al. Grape pomace compost harbors organohalide-respiring Dehalogenimonas species with novel reductive dehalogenase genes. The ISME journal, London, v. 11, n. 12, p. 2767–2780, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.127
YAQOUBI, H. et al. Evaluation of the biological treatment of a real contaminated groundwater through reductive dechlorination biostimulation. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, [s. l.], v. 7, Jan. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2025.1511251
YU, J. et al. Stabilization and Remediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Soil: Fly Ash-Based Technology for Industrial Site Restoration. Sustainability, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 18, 8132. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188132
YU, L. et al. Field Scale Biopiles for Remediation of Sulfolane Contaminated Soil. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Sciences, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p.1–8, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jenes.20.00038
ZAIB, M. et al. In-Situ Remediation Strategies to Treat Polluted Water: A Review. International Research Journal of Education and Technology, [s. l.], v. 5, p. 331-343, 2023.
ZHANG, L. et al. Research Progress and Prospect of Groundwater Pump and Treat Technology. Geoscience, [s. l.], 37, 977. 2023.
ZHANG, S. et al. Biotransformation potential of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTSA) in aerobic and anaerobic sediment. Chemosphere, [s. l.], v. 154, 224 - 30. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.062
ZHANG, W. et al. The Biological Denitrification Coupled with Chemical Reduction for Groundwater Nitrate Remediation via Using SCCMs as Carbon Source. Chemosphere, [s. l.], 234, 89 – 97. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.005
