Comparison of techniques for vapor intrusion environmental investigation – Case study: São Paulo – Brazil

Published
2026-06-08
Keywords: Summa Canister, Monitoramento Automático Contínuo, TO-15, TO-14A, Intrusão de vapores Summa Canister, Continuous Automatic Monitoring, TO-15, TO-14A, Vapor intrusion

    Authors

  • Luciano de Freitas Silvino Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro – Brasil
  • Ana Cristina Malheiros Gonçalves Carvalho Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro – Brasil

Abstract

This article aims to compare the results obtained by two soil vapor sampling techniques for use in the stages of environmental diagnosis in an area contaminated by chlorinated ethynes in groundwater. The two techniques covered in this study are Summa Canister and Continuous Automatic Monitoring. The Summa Canister is a stainless-steel container with negative pres-sure that is coupled through a pipe in the monitoring well. After sample collection, the con-tainer is sent to the laboratory for analysis using the USEPA TO-15 method. Continuous auto-matic monitoring is a technique in which pipes are coupled to the soil vapor monitoring wells and subjected to the application of negative pressure. The sample is sucked from the sam-pling point to the chromatograph injection valve in the mobile laboratory and analyzed by the USEPA TO-14A method. The results obtained using the Summa Canister technique are ex-pressed as point-in-time measurements, that is, a single concentration per sampling point representing a specific time period. The continuous automatic monitoring technique brings concentration results in real time throughout the sampling period. It is concluded that the results provided by continuous automatic monitoring allow a more assertive diagnosis of the processes of vapor intrusion in the study area. The trend analysis of the results combined with possible external interference such as environmental variables allows more appropriate con-tamination management, facilitating decision making.

References

BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Áreas contaminadas. Brasília, DF, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.mma.gov.br/cidades-sustentaveis/residuos-perigosos/areas-contaminadas.html. Acesso em: 30 out. 2019.

CITYCHLOR. DRC-13-114341-03542A: Soil-gas monitoring: soil-gas well designs and soil-gas sampling techniques. Ghent: Ineris, 2013.

FETTER, C. W. Contaminant hydrogeology. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993.

GOUVÊA JÚNIOR, J. C. R. et al. Intrusão de vapores em ambientes fechados: conceitos básicos, avaliação e gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas no Brasil. Porto Alegre: Nicole Brasil, 2016.

GOUVÊA JÚNIOR, J. C. R.; BERTOLO, R. A.; HART, S. T. Intrusão de vapores do solo: breve histórico sobre desenvolvimento da tecnologia, cenário brasileiro e avanços recentes. Holos Environment, [s. l.], v.18, n. 2, p. 240–270, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/holos.v18i2.12307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/holos.v18i2.12307

KOPPMANN, R. (ed.). Volatile Organic Compounds in the atmosphere. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988657

MA, J. et al. Vapor intrusion investigations and decision-making: a critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, [s. l.], v. 54, n. 12, p. 7050–7069, 2020. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00225. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00225. Acesso em: 03 fev. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00225

MILANI, M. G. Estudo de tecnologias de investigação ambiental em alta resolução para refinamento do modelo conceitual – Estudo de caso: Duque de Caxias – RJ. 2017. 152 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Urbana e Ambiental) - Curso de Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Urbana e Ambiental, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2017.

SILVA, C. M. da et al. Avaliação da eficiência do método TO-15 para determinação de compostos orgânicos voláteis em condições típicas de ambiente urbano. Química Nova, São Paulo, v. 39, n. 10, p.1245-1253, 8 ago. 2016. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20160142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20160142

USEPA. Compendium Method TO-14A: Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) In Ambient Air Using Specially Prepared Canisters with Subsequent Analysis by Gas Chromatography. Cincinnati, Oh: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999a.

USEPA. Compendium Method TO-15: Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in U. S. Air Collected in Specially Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). [Washington], 1999b. Disponível em: http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/airtox/to-15r.pdf. Acesso em: fev. 2016.

USEPA. Oswer technical guide for assessing and mitigating the vapor intrusion pathway from subsurface vapor sources to indoor air. [Washington], Jun. 2015.

USEPA. Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air. 2th ed. [Washington], 1999c. Disponível em: http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/airtox/tocomp99.pdf. Acesso em: nov. 2019.

How to Cite
Silvino, L. de F., & Carvalho, A. C. M. G. (2026). Comparison of techniques for vapor intrusion environmental investigation – Case study: São Paulo – Brazil. Águas Subterrâneas, 40(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14295/ras.v40i2.30372